Sustainable development is a fair distribution of development opportunities which considering to longterm vision and compliance the inter generational and inter period equity and indicates various aspects including economic, social, political and environment. The importance of sustainable development has increased by passing the time and the result of the various aspects of the policies of the public sector. One of the most important aspects of sustainable development is to achieve the financial SUSTAINABILITY that is the government‘ s fiscal policies with the long period of time and considering the results of these policies with all of its aspects. In this regard, standard indictors are required to assess the SUSTAINABILITY of public sector activities. The purpose of this paper is to examine the indictors used to assess the financial SUSTAINABILITY and its evolution. These indictors are introdused in two categories as traditional and innovative approaches. The traditional approach that include onedimensional indictors of finance including: the debt ratio, the primary surplus, the primary gap, the tax gap and innovative approach that include the composite indictors in various areas of specialization including: fiscal responsibility indictor, key national indictors including social, environmental, and economic INDICATORS.

While a glance to SUSTAINABILITY reveals its first definitions with the most emphasis on taking advantage from resources without compromising future needs, cultural SUSTAINABILITY is a term which is rather place oriented or at least place-related; not only because each community has its specific culture and value systems but also for the variety and diversity of its residents’ needs and desires. Moreover culture can be defined as an ability to retain cultural identity and to allow change to be guided in ways that are consistent with the cultural values of the people. Also culture is seen as an important contribution to all of the other fields, including social, and provides a contextual explanation which incorporates diversity and understanding. Hence, mostly due to the pressure of cultural issues and, most importantly, the increasing threats posed by rapid globalization to local identities, culture has gradually emerged out of the realm of SUSTAINABILITY and is now recognized as having a separate, distinct, and integral role. Within the community development field, culture is defined broadly as being the whole complex of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features that characterize a society or a social group. It includes not only the arts and letters, but also modes of life, the fundamental rights of the human being, value systems, traditions and beliefs, etc. (UNESCO, 1995). Within the SUSTAINABILITY field, culture is discussed in terms of cultural capital, defined as “traditions and values, heritage and place, the arts, diversity and social history” (Roseland, 2005). The stock of cultural capital, both tangible and intangible, is what we inherit from past generations and what we will pass on to the future ones. However, achieving the culturally sustained urban places is an objective which cannot be met exclusively by the manipulation of the physical environment, and in considering the wide range of elements which must be incorporated in achieving SUSTAINABILITY, it is more often the non-physical variables that are the most effective ones. The main objective of this article is to determine the priority of culture in programming toward sustainable development. To get more focus on the issue, two case-studies (United States and Canada) has been taken to study and investigate their main INDICATORS which are effective on cultural programming. Finally the findings of this study are compared with the INDICATORS and the stakeholders in the city of Tehran concerning the cultural issues. The outcome of the research reveals that cultural diversity and enforcement of cultural identities are fundamental goals towards cultural SUSTAINABILITY. Hence, as long as culture is assumed as a high rated aspect in sustainable development, it’s quite important for the municipality of a metropolis (such as Tehran) to have its own INDICATORS in supporting local identities and characteristics.

SUSTAINABILITY reporting provides information on economic, environmental, social and governance performance. Various variables may be considered as a driver for a corporate SUSTAINABILITY reporting. The purpose of this study is to identify and rank SUSTAINABILITY reporting drivers and INDICATORS. This research is qualitative and exploratory. The network analysis method is used to rank the drivers and INDICATORS. The statistical population of respondents to the questionnaire contains experts in the fields of theoretical foundations of financial reporting and social sciences, capital market and environmental protection, who responded to 23 questionnaires in 2018. The findings of the research show that SUSTAINABILITY reporting drivers are classified in 5 main groups and 24 INDICATORS. Among the drivers, the drivers of environmental requirements, corporate governance characteristics and firm structural characteristics are the most important, according to the expert opinion. Also, ranking of INDICATORS show that the legal requirements, board members independence and profitability indices have the highest rank. The results of this study can promote the awareness of users about SUSTAINABILITY reporting, drivers and INDICATORS.

Knowing the components of economic education provides the dynamic background of education in this field. The aim of the current research is to investigate the INDICATORS and components of the economic education curriculum. The approach of the current research is qualitative and its method is research synthesis. The research community is all the articles (211 articles) that have been presented from 1390 to 1401 AD and from 2010 to 2022 AD regarding economic education in curricula. The sample of the research is 32 articles, which were selected based on thematic monitoring, theoretical data saturation, and purposefully. The research data were collected from the qualitative analysis of the studied articles. By analyzing the data, the dimensions of vitality in the curriculum of the elementary school in 4 factors and 55 categories including the dimension of individual factors (including INDICATORS and components related to personality characteristics); The dimension of culture and economic ethics (economic fields in the society); The dimension of economic concepts and knowledge (indices in economic education) and the dimension of collective and communication concepts (communication and interaction INDICATORS in education) were classified. Economic education is dependent on internal and external components in educational systems, which requires macro-planning in this field.

Among the dimensions of sustainable development, social SUSTAINABILITY is recognized as one of the main dimensions that is most in line with the dimensions of people's lives. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and evaluate the INDICATORS of social SUSTAINABILITY derived from the global goals of sustainable development (SDGs) in people's lives and its feedback in the geographical architecture of Gilan region. The method of evaluating the rank of the options of this research is Vikor technique and the research method is descriptive-survey and the statistical population studied in this research is the members of 6 groups related to the research subject including: villages of 16 cities of Gilan province Local architects, the Gilan General Directorate of Housing and Natural Resources and Forestry, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) love the environment, among which the selection of a sample community was made possible by non-probable sampling. Findings show that "social justice" with the highest value of SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS (0.083) has the highest priority and "social progress and welfare" with (0.034) have the lowest priority and among 6 The social stability index, the two INDICATORS of correlation and responsible consumption, and the average production have been evaluated and are of no importance to the groups related to the architecture of the Guilan region.

Sustainable development is a comprehensive approach to improve human life quality and to meet economical, social and environmental needs of anthropological residents. In order to have a proper management of natural resources, at first it is necessary to determine the criteria that affect SUSTAINABILITY and use the most appropriate criteria. In this research, by forming a committee of experts and the strategic planning SWOT, criteria affecting the sustainable development of natural resources including management and organizational structure, natural resource economics, environmental factors and social and cultural issues of ecology and natural resources were determined. In addition, the effective INDICATORS were identified for each criterion. The questionnaires with inconsistent coefficient less than 0. 1 were selected for weighting. The overall compliance rate of the model for the criteria management and organizational structure of natural resources, sociocultural issues of natural resources, ecology and environmental issues of natural resources and natural resource economics issues were 0. 01, 0. 01, 0. 01 and 0. 03, respectively. Then, by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), the four most important and influential criteria were examined,the contribution of standard organizational structure and management of natural resources was determined as 38%. Implementation of integrated and systematic natural resources management in management and organizational structure, natural resource economics, environmental factors and social and cultural issues of ecology is essential for sustainable development of natural resources.

Within the SUSTAINABILITY field, culture is discussed in terms of cultural capital, defined as “traditions and values, heritage and place, the arts, diversity and social history” (Roseland, 2005). The stock of cultural capital, both tangible and intangible, is what we inherit from past generations and what we will pass on to future generations.  However the achieving of culturally sustained urban places is an aim which cannot be met exclusively by the manipulation of the physical environment, and in considering the wide range of elements which must be incorporated in achieving SUSTAINABILITY, it is more often the non-physical variables that are the most effective. Peter Hall says, when speaking about cultural capital, there could not be a single model of SUSTAINABILITY as the issue is very place-oriented. As a need for local approach to cultural SUSTAINABILITY every community should determine its own stakeholders and INDICATORS which are (or should be) considered in local cultural policy making. This article is a summary of a research held by author in which aimed to present a framework and basis for cultural policy making in local level. Applying a comparative study among several European and American cities’ cultural approaches to public realm together with determining local stakeholders and their cultural programs and projects in Tehran the research comes up with essential INDICATORS which should be considered in cultural decision making within public realm in Tehran.